Brendan Eich |
There has been much celebration and
consternation over the forced resignation of Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich.
Much of the commentary reflects
surprise at the firing.
This sort of incident should
surprise no one. It’s just one more indication among many that effective 21st
century leadership is quite distinct from familiar, 20th century
norms.
As Eich acknowledged in his
departure statement, he could no longer be an “effective leader” under the
circumstances.
21st Century Leader Lessons from Mozilla CEO Firing
The 21st century leadership lessons
reflected in the Mozilla case include:
1. Leadership Roles Are
Converging. Serve to Lead reports the convergence of
various types of leadership roles that were once thought of as entirely
separate. In a 2001 piece, “Corporate Politicians,” I wrote of the
rapid evolution of expectations underway for CEOs. The capacity of companies to
serve rising numbers of shareholders is accompanied by greater accountability.
21st century business leaders are now facing expectations of transparency
closer to those of politicians than of the cossetted CEO’s of the recent
past. These trends run across business sectors, as well as government and
not-for-profits. What individuals in high positions in business actually do,
day-to-day, is converging with the work of their counterparts in other sectors.
2. Stakeholder
Relationships Can be Wider and Deeper Than in the Past. The Internet
accelerates and provides a platform for organizing stakeholders with intensely
held points of view. In the Mozilla case, as in other situations with companies
in recent years, employees initiated and supported the expressions of concern
from outside stakeholders.
3. Values Create Value.
Many customers (including business-to-business) find value in advancing
their own values through the products and services they select. In the case of
Mozilla, consumer products such as web browsers are readily substituted. It’s
essential that enterprises align as far as possible with the values and
aspirations of their customer base.
4. Private and Public Life
Are Melding. Brendan Eich apparently believed that his donation to a
controversial ballot measure in 2008 would not be regarded as relevant in
assessing his performance as CEO in 2014. Eich did not reckon with the fact
that his private life had become, to a great extent, public property as he
ascended to the greater responsibilities of the CEO position. Eich faltered in
not forging integrity between his personal values and his service to his
enterprise.
5. Communication is a
Primary Obligation of CEO. Eich is, by all accounts, exceptionally
talented and valuable as a technician. One suspects that he did not recognize
that a core competency to create value as CEO today is communication. That
means far more than putting out press statements after the fact. In a time when
leadership is based, more than ever, on the capacity to influence, effective
communication is foundational.
6. If Your Communication is
Not Mission Critical, It’s Self Indulgent. As one rises in leadership
responsibility, almost every action one takes can be viewed as a communication.
Certainly a public donation to a controversial political campaign can be viewed
as a significant communication. To the extent that one has great visibility,
any communication that is not mission-critical, that is not aligned with
enterprise priorities, is unnecessary at best, self-indulgent at worst.
7. The First Amendment Is
Not at Issue. Brendan Eich, American, has an absolute right to free
speech under the First Amendment. Brendan Eich, CEO, acted in a representative
capacity, subject to the consent of various stakeholders he’s committed to
serve.
8. Where Was the Mozilla
Board? If public reports are accurate, Eich received scant support
from his company’s board. This was the board that had recently selected him to
serve as CEO. It’s in everyone’s interest that boards provide effective
governance.
9. Personnel Selection.
Eich’s 2008 donation had been a matter of public record and some
controversy for some time. Did the board undertake sufficient diligence in
evaluating this? Did the board focus on the skills and awareness that Eich
would soon need?
10. Leadership Training is
Essential for New CEOs. There is a paradox in selecting high
positional leaders. On the one hand, it’s clear enough that no one can be fully
prepared for the challenges of a high level CEO position in any sector. There
is always more to be learned, areas where one must grow. On the other hand, the
confidence of the new CEO herself, as well as those who selected her, may
occasion some to overlook the urgency of preparation. It may have been presumed
by Eich and others that his history with the company meant that he
required little or no training for his new role. If so, this may have been a
fatal error in judgment.
No comments:
Post a Comment